The impact of the flu epidemic on those who lived through it must set out been really great. The necessity of caring for massive numbers of sick and the softness to keep businesses going for lack of personnel would have make the experience as cataclysmic as a indwelling disaster like earthquake or tornado. In addition, the idolatry of possibly getting sick would have been traumatic, and the grief of losing love ones would have been devastating. The most constructive response we nooky have toward such losses is to study the epidemic and learn what we can from it.
mportant things we can learn from a study of the epidemic are what worked, what did not work, and how we can distinguish the lessons learned to our experience today. One thing we know did not work was vaccination. According to Dr.
Eleanor McBean, who was an eyewitness of the 1918 epidemic, "...the flu hit sole(prenominal) the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu" (Adams). She and her family had refused the shots and were among those that remained well. On the other hand, homeopathy treatments did work. A 1918 article, "Spanish Influenza Treatment," reports that patients were given twice-daily enemas to clean their bowels, drank three to quaternary quarts of water or fruit juice daily to instigate elimination, took short, hot baths and used hot blanket packs for pain, and used common cold compresses for headac
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment