Mathilde Loisel's The Necklace & Louise Mallard's The Story of An Hour

Loisel looked old now. She had become the char of impoverished households--strong and hard and rough" (Maupassant 51). However, along the way, forced by her own pride and superficial values to lead a life which she believed to be beneath her, Mathilde learns important lessons:

Mme, Loisel now knew the trem cobbler's lastous exis cardinalce of the needy. She took her part, more thanover, all of a sudden, with heroism. That dreadful debt must be paid. She would pay it (Maupassant 50).

Maupassant does non report the response of Mathilde when she learns from her rich superstar that the necklace she had lost ten years before was a forte imitation. Possibly, like Louise when she intimate her controlling husband was a hold up, Mathilde dropped dead. In any(prenominal) case, it would be interesting to learn if she maintained her heroic positioning toward the ten years of hard labor she endured in baffle to pay back a debt she never owed. The lesson for Mathilde in the end remains what it was in the beginning: do not live according to false and superficial values and do not judge yourself or others by material standards.

Louise has a very much more cunning character than Mathilde. Mathilde is a simple fair sex who lives according to superficial standards. Mathilde is a woman who is transparent contempt her desire to be something she is not; Louise is revealed as a involved woman whose true character is revealed only when her husband dies. wholeness might argue that Mathilde becomes a deeper woman when she i

something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully. What was it? She did not slam. It was too subtle and elusive to name. . . . She was beginning to recognize this thing that was approaching to cause her. . . . A little whispered word escaped her split lips . . . : "free, free, free!" (Chopin 1-2).

The fate of Louise, on the other hand, is decided and sort out by Chopin. Unlike the twaddle of Mathilde, whose life both sexual and external the reader comes to know in some detail, the story of Louise leaves many doubts and gaps. She has "heart trouble," but the reader does not know its cause. She experiences no denial virtually her husband's reported death, but or else "wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment.

" Louise clearly has a much more subtle inner life than the rather crude Mathilde. Louise senses

s forced into ten years of hard labor, but, again, Maupassant does not tell the reader how much of that compassion for the needy remains when Mathilde discovers the accuracy of the necklace. Will she any longer feel that she has learned a valuable lesson because of her labor, or will she slip into madness at the discovery that the necklace was a cheap imitation?

Mathilde could charter learned from her experience with the necklace at the ball that what matters is not what one puts more or less one's neck but what puts in one's head. Alas, she was not intelligent or wise enough to come to such a conclusion, and, in any case, discovered the necklace missing before she had much term to think anything at all. Had she told her wealthy friend she had lost the necklace, she would defend discovered it was a cheap imitation, and then perhaps the lesson would have been learned. Alas, again, pride and fear prevented Mathilde from being herself, from telling the truth, and the result is ten years of hard labor and the stunning news about the necklace that ends the story. The question is---will the rich woman give Mathilde the diamond necklace, or the thirty thousand f
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.