If athletes choose to make gains in performance made operable by the use of steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs, along with the risk of harm to the alternative of less risk and worse performance, what gives anyone the refine to get in the way of their decision? If we do non prohibit smokers and drinkers from risking their health with cigarettes and alcohol, then why should we prohibit athletes from taking risks with their health in quest of achieving their goals? There is no keen-witted argument to support the belief that enhancing performance is unfair. If it was unfair to use performance-enhancing drugs, then we would also have to ban coaching and discipline because every athlete has a coach with a different level of experience and expertise, and not every athlete trains at the same level. Competition can be unfair if at that place is unequal glide slope to certain enhancements, but equal access can be attained more... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment