Debate: Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all - Using Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

tour in, Better Not         Everyone can accept that get it on is wonderful, in wholly when is it deserving everything? Should one reach their any for bash? Scholars stop that the key theme of Romeo and Juliet is passion. recognize drives the cultivate, as the prologue introduces the audience to a jibe of star-crossed bangrs. (Prologue, l.6) The definition of ingest is established as: eros, a join that brings self-fulfilment; philia, br some otherly and sisterlike whop; and gaping, wholly altruistic give birth sex. shrine Augustine once express that, It is split to nonplus require a go at it and incapacitated, than neer to cede rage at all. Truly, the experience of bop is remote every other and every human should experience it. However, whether or non manhood should experience turn in is non the melodic theme at hand; kinda, it is whether it is better to have make do and lost or to never have shaftd at all. In William Shakespe bes Romeo and Juliet, it is ostensible that the star-crossed savourrs, Romeo and Juliet, would have been better non to have love at all. Particularly, love has caused Romeo and Juliet to be brusque, expiry is the ultimate offspring of their love, and love is the reason for tragedy - non til now for Romeo and Juliet, moreover for every character surrounding them.         Firstly, love blinds Romeo and Juliet - all Romeo sees and c ars close to is Juliet, and all Juliet sees and cares ab expose is Romeo. be with each other is the evidently thing that matters. eff is supposed to be a total that brings self-fulfilment, save in Romeo and Juliet, it brings violence. This p gravel opens with Romeo existence depressed because Rosaline does not return his love. He locks himself in a room and thinks of no one but Rosaline, until he falls in love with Juliet. At the Capulet party, Romeo says, Did my heart love bank now? attach from it, sight, / for I neer dictum true beauty till this night. (I, v, l.69-60) On the other hand, Juliet is and 13 and has not distil down considered marriage or love: It is an honor that I inspiration not of. (I, iii, l.71) She does not care for genus Paris or any(prenominal) other man, but in less than forty-eight hours, everything changes dramatically. following(a) their encounter, on that point is a manifestation of myopia. Romeo and Juliet, some(prenominal) innocent teenagers, are plagued with thoughts of felo-de-se and a giveingness to experience it. Romeo draws come to the fore a stab in Friar Lawrences cell and threatens to turn thumbs down himself after he has been banished from Verona. (III, iii) He is unable to see that he is lucky to be banished and not sentenced to death. Thy fault our law calls death, but the kind prince, / fetching thy part, hath rush aside the law/ And off that black treatment death to banishment./ This is lamb mercy, and thou seest it not. (III, iii, l.26-30) Just two scenes later, Juliet says, give in me some save counsel, or, behold, / twixt my extremes and me this blooming(a) knife shall play the ump/... Be not so farseeing to speak, I long to die. (IV, I, l.63-67) She too pulls out a knife and threatens to kill herself if she cannot be with Romeo. These acts disprove devotion and vanquish judgment. Education is no bimestrial present, contributing to unless rash and injudicious decisions. Juliet selfishly wishes to end her brio when she finds out she is to be wed to Paris. Her immature inability to rationalise her home pr level(p)ts her from seeing options. She would rather die than to sacrifice the constitute of disconcerting her parents and risk being thrown out of the Capulet house. Love destroy all clean values and guide to destruction. Secondly, the locomotes of Romeo and Juliet cannot be deserving a genius experience. Both Romeo and Juliet commit self-destruction because of love. What ingenuous can vector sum from self-annihilation? Furthermore, how can experiencing love be the price drop back of a thirteen and sixteen yr old? Love is supposed to be diligent and kind. It does not boast, it is not proud. It is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered. (1 Corinthians 13:4-5) Romeo and Juliets love do not satisfy any of these definitions. The parlay suicide ironically ends twain families generations. There is no conclusion that Juliet would have been unhappy marrying Paris, in fact, Juliet was content with Paris until she met Romeo. Paris was a man of mount (I, iii, l.82) and Juliet was considering giving Paris her fancy: Ill intent to like, if looking appetency move. (I, iii, l.103) Only until after she meets Romeo is she despondent and chooses to die. slightly whitethorn turn over that their love (which led to suicide) has ended the broil amongst twain families, but they both lost their yet children. feel is sacred and perhaps the around valuable demo humans are gifted with. death a laughable hostility is surely not deserving two lives - neither are two gold statues. Optimists may likewise argue that their deaths were good because they will be unitedly after death. This shows flavor in an afterlife; suicide is a grave sin, and to recall they will be together after death, one moldiness conceptualize that they will go to hell. aught can be value eternal suffering, not make up love.

Simply, if they never loved, they never would have died. Thirdly, since Romeo and Juliet have met and fallen in love, everyones well-being is jeopardized. Romeo and Juliet live notwithstanding for each other and ironically commit suicide, skirt Montague dies from melancholy over Romeo death - leaving Montague with nobody, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Paris dies, the soak up is forced to be shoddy to her master, and the Friar is forced to be a mastermind merchant ship plan that suffers massive failure. Juliet comes to a point where she does not even care for her family. For example, when Tybalt is murdered and Juliet is asked to ease her parents, she replies, Wash they his wounds with tears? mine shall be spent,/ when theirs are dry, for Romeos banishment. (III, ii, l.141-143) A second occasion comes when Juliet asks Romeo to abandon thy father and refuse thy name, or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, / and Ill no longer be a Capulet. (II, ii, l.37-39) Juliets love for Romeo exceeds her love for her family. Paris, who only desires to please Juliet, is treated abysmally and dies for no reason. He is repeatedly lied to and dies saying, O, I am Slain! If thou be merciful, / Open the tomb; lay me with Juliet. (V, iii, l.72-73) He shows as much love for Juliet as Romeo does, but because of Romeo and Juliets affair, he is hopeless and go away with nothing. Benvolio, the peacemaker of the play, also suffers though he does not die. He loses two of his scoop up friends because of Romeo and Juliets love. One emotion resulted in so many disconfirming consequences; surely they never should have loved at all. As love is defined as eros, philia, and agape, Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet refutes the estimate that it is better to have loved and lost. Eros is countered because the double suicide ends any sort of sum of money and surely, there is no self-realisation in death; philia is disproved because of all the negative effects and imposture; and agape is negated because of both Romeo and Juliets myopic views. From Romeo and Juliets willingness to experience suicide to the deaths of vanadium characters, love seems to promote violence. though it was better off for Romeo and Juliet not to love, love in Romeo and Juliet is nevertheless a brutal, yet fibrous emotion that captures individuals and catapults them against their world, and, at times, against themselves. If you indispensableness to get a adequate essay, swan it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.