Running head : napve realityNapve Realism , Locke , and DescartesName of ClientUniversity AffiliationNapve realism was once recognized as a major philosophy . But right away , it is simply a recalled in philosophy classes to demonstrate that in the search for wisdom , some systems of thought argon get rid of . The fate of napve realism was sealed when two influential kit and caboodle became accepted by intellectual circles . These were the works of John Locke and Rene DescartesNapve realism believes that what is immediately and directly perceived becomes the evidence of the justness of an quarry . For fashion model , the shape of the ball is round and thus , the rectitude is that the ball is indeed round . This statement was negated , first by Descartes and then by Locke But first it must be made known that these two philosophers , Descartes and Locke , do not see the same approach to knowledge . Descartes is one of the rationalists , who utilize apprehension to acquire knowledge and truth Locke , on the other blow over , is one of the empiricists , who emphasize the importance of experience in the gather up for knowledge . With this major difference in mind , it would be understandable to discover that Descartes and Locke wielded different approaches in repudiating napve realismDescartes contends that the mind has a better grasp of knowledge and truth and not the senses . The determinations that are seen and touched are just representations of what is residing in the mind . For manikin , an artist could not wholly create a scratch to represent an creative thinkerlized image in his mind . therefrom , Descartes created an alternative to napve realism and he calls it indirect representative realism (Arnold , 2005Locke , on the other hand , distinguishes between two qualities of objects : the patriarchal and the secondary . The former is objective and therefore , speaks the truth of the object , where as the latter is subjective and abide be changed .

For example , the presence of warmth is a primary note of send packing while the presence of pain is a secondary quality . Pain is secondary because it is a reaction of a human race who comes too near to the kindling . The napve realists might believe that fire is painful but this is not the truth . However , the idea that fire has warmth is true , whether a human ball perceives it or notThe arguments of Descartes and Locke made me conclude that an individual knower of the world may only gain a fraction of the truth which is presented through his immediate perception . The rest of the truth can be obtained by both investigation and reflectionBibliographyArnold , N .S (2005 . Descartes and the paradox of knowledge . Retrieved August 16 , 2007 from the University of Alabama in Birmingham division of Philosophy website at http /www .uab .edu /philosophy / qualification /arnold /5-Descartes .htmRichards , S .A (2006 . John Locke : Primary and secondary qualities Retrieved August 16 , 2007 from the Pelusa Media Group Faithnet .org website at http /www .faithnet .org .uk /Philosophy /Locke /locke_qualities .htmPAGE 4PAGE 4Napve Realism...If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment