How The Confederates Won The War

written by Dr . W . Wayne Smith begins with Smith presenting a brief look at a graphic symbol from George Orwell s 1984 The character is Winston Smith , and his role in the book is to make veritable that all the historical records of the past were representative of the political article of belief of the day . Any documents in conflict with that doctrine had to be destroyed . Dr . Smith states that the work of Winston Smith raises three central issues with regard to the nature of history : whether history can be created by people with an agenda whether history incorporates the prejudices or social values of society at a given quantify and whether historical records can be wrong or control the past . He goes on to state that these issues are top hat illustrated through the writing of well-mannered contend historyDr . Smith states that in to understand his argument , it is necessary to understand the pro- thrall stance of the emeritus southbound . The following evidence is provided : first , southerly intellectuals defended thrall by stating that it was beneficial for the national economy , for the slaves , and for Southern subtlety certify , immediately following the secession of the Deep South states , they sent ambassadors to Upper South states with a message stating the address of the Confederacy , which was to defend sla very(prenominal) and leash , on establish 21 , 1861 , the Vice-President of the Confederacy - Alexander H . Stephens - declared that slavery was the foundation of the Confederacy . Clearly then , slavery was the underlie issue of the accomplished WarSmith continues by discussing the various groups of who presented Civil War history . The first group consisted of those who actually fought in the struggle , and they are categorized as apologists . The of this group were predominantly Southern , and as a result their stories often became justification for and plea of the Confederacy .

They changed the underlying issue of the war from that of slavery to that of states rightsThe second group of consisted of historians representing the first generation that came of age after the Civil War . Spanning the period of 1890 to 1910 , these historians were members of the nationalist school . They viewed history as a series of cataclysmic accompaniments that could not be intimately controlled . Also , their presentation of military and political history was very impersonal , which led them to view the Civil War being the result of sectional and economic issues that could not be resolvedThe third group of emerged in the 1920s and 1930s , following creation War I , which they viewed as a catastrophic event that had caused nothing but death and destruction . Their attitude was that the war could have been averted , and this same stance was adopted with regard to the Civil War . In both situations , they believed that had the politicians involved been more intelligent , neither war would have occurredThe fourth group of that emerged in the 1940s was known as the moralist school . They were influenced...If you necessitate to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .