| Results of the ask showed that the biggest effect was produced by incentives to graduate from high school, which was four times as powerful as the three strikes law (Prisons, 1994). Parent training was adjoining in effectiveness, being roughly three times as effective, and delinquent supervision was slightly more effective. Home visits were non very effective. It was estimated that one million dollars spent on get-go incentives would save the criminal justice system between $600,000 and $1.1 million, so the program would probably pay for itself. An some other recent field of study showed that every $1 invested in drug treatment save $7 in future costs of aversion and incarceration. Studies kindred these show that even the harshest prison terms do slight to prevent crime than many programs that strengthen families and provide for benevolent needs. Imprisonment is also more costly than many of these other programs. Research over the past 10 years has show consistently that the most effective way to reduce crime and recidivism is through education, and in particular literacy training and GED (Henry).
An Adult Probation study in Arizona found that probationers who received literacy training had a 35 percent lower rearrest rate than a realise group (46 percent rearrest rate), and those who received their GED had a rearrest rate of 24 percent. A Florida |
Henry, S. (2003). On the effectiveness of prison as punishment. Retrieved May 25, 2005 from: hypertext transfer protocol://paulsjusticepage.com/paul/mopping.htm http://www.prevention.gc.ca/en/library/publications/invest/ Prisons don't prevent crime: conservativist think tank. (1994). Retrieved May 25, 2005 from: | Order your essay at
Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment