A Utopian Future

The risk of poverty arises because the popularity of the ideas de nonative by any writer is what determines a book's success or failure (108-112). Clearly, the result is that unpopular ideas volition inevitably revenge the thinker economically. In addition, the society described is composed of pile who would not look favorably on unpopular ideas in the first place, because such ideas would almost certainly threaten the brotherly exhibition in some way. It is preposterous for Bellamy to suggest that zilch would want to express such potentially subversive ideas in his utopian society, because such a suggestion shows assoil ignorance of gracious individuality. The human individual in a in truth unthaw society must have the right to express his or her ideas, whether they are subversive, promote "disorder," or are even wholly insane or meaningless---without the fear of economic disaster or ostracism from a disapproving government or majority of the tidy sum. In an ideal society, in fact, it should be the role of the government to encourage and support such unpopular ideas---precisely because they are unpopular, will not profit the writer or artist or thinker economically, and may not find an avenue for brass through private means. For a society to be very free, the dissemination of such unpopular views must be ensured, without economic, mixer or legal punishment resulting.

The government essentially runs industriousness as well,

This is, of course, a land site painted by a man in shade denial about the innate shortcomings of human nature. It is simply pie-eyed to argue that the greediest breed of human being ever establishd---the capitalist---would abruptly become a benevolent, philanthropic, selfless leader concerned not with his own berth and wealth unless with the "common following for the common profit" (57). The government in Bellamy's utopia encourages monopoly which will as if by magic transform capitalists into social-minded saints (56). What this situation will in fact create is an oppressive society in which the people are complete slaves to the whims of the monopoly, which in turn is encourageed by the government.

In fact, as in today's capitalist society, there seems to be little difference, if any, in the midst of the capitalist and the government leader. The result, in either case, is the oppression of the people who are powerless in the face of the wealth and power of the corporation and the government. When Bellamy proposes doing away with competing interests in society in order to eliminate corruption and abuses of power, he is displaying an amazing lack of logic. If whizz organizes competing gangs into a single entity, is the result a transformation of those gangs into a benevolent unit, or is the result an even greater dousing of evil? The government which approvingly oversees a society dominated by monopolies is more vulnerable to corruption, oppression and abuses of power than a society of competing interests overseen by a government designed to protect the people from economic, social, political and other oppression.

and once again Bellamy posits a situation he believes to be utopian when it is, in fact, truly and thoroughly oppressive. It is difficult at times to differentiate surrounded by the omnipotent corporate entity which controls all commerce and industry, and the government which runs society, but it is clear that the government is aligned with that entity. When the narrator a
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.